![]() ![]() However, this is an extremely problematic view. There is a general acceptance in both popular discourse and the more mainstream parts of political science and international studies that democracy and development are conducive to each other. Last part, these arguments are demonstrated through the Wukan Incident. Fragmented authoritarianism is suggested to make an efficient third realm for resisters possible. Besides, feasibility of rightful resistance’s operationalization isĭiscussed. The construction is realized through the discourse. It is claimed that this is a discursive third realm since ![]() In the fourth part, it isĮxplained how rightful resistance constructs a third realm. In the third part, Huang’s concept of ‘third realm’ is delineated. Some difficulties preventing the accurate grasp of the reality because of the historical baggage and ambivalentĭefinitions of the concepts. It is argued that such applications and conceptualizations have In terms of applicability and conceptualization. The first part in the second part, civil society and public sphere as first alternatives coming to mind are examined ![]() After the introduction of ‘rightful resistance’ in The main thesis is that rightful resistance It questions whether rightful resistance is a third realm or not. This article aims to bring a new angle to the literature by joining ‘rightful resistance’ of O’Brien and ‘third realm’ ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |